Bangladesh was rocked yet again by mob violence this week as a second Hindu man, identified as Amrit Mondal (also known as Samrat), was brutally beaten to death by a local crowd in Rajbari district’s Pangsha upazila late on Wednesday night. The lynching comes just days after the internationally condemned killing of Dipu Chandra Das, a Hindu garment factory worker, whose brutal death in Mymensingh district triggered widespread protests and global concern over mob justice and minority safety in the country.
What Happened in the Latest Lynching?
According to local police and preliminary investigations, the incident began when Mondal, a 29-year-old man with a documented criminal background, reportedly returned to his native Hosendanga village in Kalimohor union and went to the house of a resident, Shahidul Islam, late on Wednesday night. The police claim Mondal was attempting to collect chanda — a form of extortion money — along with members of his group, locally referred to as the “Samrat Bahini.”
The situation quickly escalated as family members raised the alarm, shouting that the group were “robbers.” Word spread rapidly, and locals assembled at the scene, eventually overpowering Mondal and subjecting him to a violent beating. He was taken to hospital in critical condition but was declared dead early Thursday morning. Police say one of his associates, Mohammed Selim, was detained at the scene with two firearms, while the others fled.
Government Response: ‘Not a Communal Attack’
The interim Bangladesh government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, condemned the killing as “violent” and “tragic,” but strongly asserted that the incident was not a communal attack motivated by the victim’s religion. Government spokesperson Shafiqul Alam emphasized that preliminary findings linked the incident to criminal conduct — extortion and prior serious charges, including murder and illegal weapons possession — rather than a targeted assault on a religious community.
In its official statement, the government described Mondal as a “top terrorist” and stressed that attempts by “certain segments” to present the killing as driven by communal hatred were misleading and provocative. Authorities also said legal actions would be taken against those responsible, while distinguishing it from the earlier killing of Dipu Chandra Das, which authorities acknowledged as a heinous crime but also maintained lacked verified evidence of blasphemy or religious motivation.
Context: The First Lynching and Increasing Unrest
To understand the gravity of the latest killing, it’s essential to revisit the lynching of Dipu Chandra Das on December 18, 2025 in Bhaluka, Mymensingh. Das, a 27-year-old Hindu factory worker, was accused by a mob of making derogatory remarks about Islam — allegations that were never independently verified and according to official reports may have stemmed from a workplace dispute. He was beaten to death, and in an especially disturbing act, his body was tied to a tree and set on fire.
The images and videos of that killing sparked national and international outrage, with human rights groups, protest movements, and diplomatic voices calling for accountability and protection for minority communities. Large protests took place in Bangladesh, and demonstrations were held outside the Bangladesh High Commission in New Delhi, where activists condemned the targeting of minorities and demanded justice.
Why These Incidents Matter
These back-to-back lynchings have amplified fears among minority communities in Bangladesh — particularly Hindus, who are a significant religious minority. Critics argue that mob violence and lawlessness are increasingly replacing formal justice, creating an atmosphere in which accusations — whether rooted in rumor, social tensions, or conflict — can lead to instant and deadly retribution without legal due process.
International rights groups have highlighted that such attacks are occurring against the backdrop of prolonged political unrest in the country. Violence first escalated following the assassination attempt and subsequent death of Sharif Osman Hadi, a youth leader associated with the 2024 uprising that ended former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s long tenure. His death sparked widespread protests, attacks on media and cultural institutions, and a broader atmosphere of instability.
Government’s Broader Message
While the interim government has publicly condemned both lynchings, it has also sought to separate criminal motive from communal motive — particularly in the case of Mondal. The official narrative emphasizes that violence resulting from alleged extortion activities should not be conflated with anti-minority sentiment. Authorities stress that Bangladesh’s constitution prohibits discrimination based on religion, and that prompt investigations and legal penalties will be pursued for any and all mob violence.
Bangladesh’s police have reportedly arrested several individuals in the Das killing and are continuing to pursue inquiries into Mondal’s death as well. However, critics argue that mere condemnation and isolated arrests are insufficient to tackle deeper issues of mob justice, political polarization, and community tensions.
Voices of Concern at Home and Abroad
The Indian government, among others, has publicly expressed concern about the wave of violence against minority communities, calling for accountability and stronger protections. New Delhi has noted numerous reported incidents of violence against Hindus and other minorities in Bangladesh this year, underscoring a need for transparent, impartial action by Dhaka’s authorities.
Locally, community leaders and activists have warned that the fear and insecurity gripping minority populations could have long-term social consequences, potentially exacerbating migration pressures, reinforcing communal narratives abroad, and deepening fault lines within Bangladesh society.
What Happens Next?
As of now, stern official statements and promises of legal action have yet to quell broader anxiety about mob justice in Bangladesh. The recent events — a blasphemy-linked lynching followed by a criminally attributed mob killing — collectively pose urgent questions about law enforcement, justice access, and protection of vulnerable groups. Whether authorities can restore confidence among minority communities and curb lawlessness remains a deeply challenging task.
For now, Bangladesh watches closely as both internal and external pressures mount to address the twin crises of unrest and violence — and to ensure that every citizen, regardless of religion or social status, receives equal protection under the law.
Journalist Details
