
The Supreme Court of India is set to hear a petition filed by Asaduddin Owaisi, leader of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (AIMIM), challenging the contentious Waqf Bill, which is aimed at reforming the administration of Waqf properties across India. Owaisi, who has consistently been a strong critic of several government initiatives, now seeks judicial intervention to prevent the Bill’s enactment, claiming it violates the constitutional rights of Muslims.
The Waqf Bill, if passed, would amend the Waqf Act of 1995, and its supporters argue that it would bring much-needed reforms to the management of Waqf properties. The Bill proposes that the central government take a more active role in overseeing these properties, including the creation of a Waqf Development and Reform Authority.
However, Owaisi and other critics argue that the Bill infringes upon the religious autonomy of the Muslim community by giving the central government excessive control over Waqf properties. The AIMIM leader has expressed concerns that this could lead to the centralization of power and diminish the ability of local Waqf Boards to make decisions that best serve their communities.
The petition filed by Owaisi seeks an immediate injunction on the Bill, pending a thorough judicial review. His legal team argues that the Bill contravenes the constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and the right to manage religious affairs. The matter is of great significance, as it involves a direct confrontation between the state’s interests and the rights of religious communities.
The government has argued that the Bill is aimed at ensuring better governance and transparency in the management of Waqf assets, which, according to them, have often been misused or underutilized. The legal battle now awaits the Supreme Court’s decision, which could have far-reaching implications for the relationship between the Indian state and its Muslim community.